DAT for PCA

Top Seller Differential Aptitude Tests for PCA

Measure any combination of job aptitudes with these proven tests

At a Glance:

  • ADMINISTRATION: 6-20 minutes per test, Paper and Online
  • COMPETENCY AREAS: General Cognitive Abilities, Perceptual Abilities, Clerical and Language Skills
  • LANGUAGE: English
  • READING LEVEL: 6th Grade

Who is it for?

Each DAT for PCA test is used for specific occupations.


Test
What it does:
Jobs/Fields
Verbal Reasoning Verbal Reasoning measures general cognitive ability in positions requiring higher order thinking skills  
Numerical Ability
Numerical Ability tests the understanding of numerical relationships and facility in handling numerical concepts

Project Manager
Bookkeeper
Statistician
Shipping Clerk

Abstract Reasoning
Abstract Reasoning is a nonverbal measure of the ability to perceive relationships in abstract figure patterns

Skilled Trades
Computer Programming
Drafting
Auto Repair

Mechanical Reasoning Mechanical Reasoning closely parallels the Bennett Mechanical Comprehension Test and measures the ability to understand basic mechanical principles of machinery, tools, and motion

Carpenter
Mechanic
Maintenance Worker
Assembler

Clerical Speed and Accuracy Clerical Speed and Accuracy (only in paper) measures the speed of response in a simple perceptual task. Suitable for jobs involve filing and coding  
Space Relations
Space Relations measures the ability to visualize a three-dimensional object from a two-dimensional pattern, and how this object would look if rotated

Drafting
Architecture
Die-making
Carpentry
Clothing Design
Art
Decorating
Dentistry

Spelling Spelling (only in paper) measures an applicant's ability to spell common English words  
Language Usage
Language Usage measures the ability to detect errors in grammar, punctuation, and capitalization
 

Validity Studies

  • Strongly correlated with other well-known aptitude tests such as the GATB (r = .62 to .81 for tests intended to tap similar aptitudes) and ASVAB (r =.73 to .79 for tests intended to tap similar aptitudes)
  • Shown to predict training success (e.g., r = .46 to .48 for computer programmers) and job performance (e.g., r = .24 to .31 for administrative, technical, and engineering employees) for a wide range of occupations